Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:30
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Two More Persona 4 Actors Have Said They're Not Returning for an Unannounced Persona 4 Remake - IGN
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Have you ever been humiliated in front of a group of girls and enjoyed it?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Did another parent ever tell you something about your child that you didn’t know?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Windows Snipping Tool now lets you create animated GIF recordings - BleepingComputer
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
GM plans $4 billion push to move production from Mexico to U.S. - The Detroit News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.